BlockRun

Comparison

BlockRun vs Helicone

They solve different problems. BlockRun is a payment gateway: you call BlockRun and it pays the upstream provider for you. Helicone is an observability proxy: you call OpenAI/Anthropic/etc. through Helicone and it logs every request. Many teams use both.

Side-by-side

FeatureBlockRunHelicone
Primary purposePay providers on your behalfLog + analyze your LLM calls
Pays the upstream provider?YesNo (you still bring your own provider keys)
BillingPay-per-call USDC over x402Free tier + paid tiers based on log volume
AuthWallet signature per callAPI key (passes through your provider key)
ObservabilityBasic metrics + on-chain receiptsDeep — request logs, prompt diffs, costs, latencies
CachingNoOptional
Free modelsYes, no signupN/A — you bring your own provider
Multi-provider routingYes (one OpenAI-compatible endpoint)No (Helicone is per-provider)
MCP ServerYes (10 tools)No

When to choose BlockRun

  • You don't want to manage provider API keys at all.
  • You're building agents that pay per-call from a wallet.
  • You want one OpenAI-compatible endpoint in front of 55+ models.
  • You need data + media + compute APIs alongside chat.

When to choose Helicone

  • You already have direct provider relationships and API keys.
  • You need deep request logging, prompt diffing, and cost analytics.
  • You want to debug specific LLM responses with full traces.
  • You don't need a payment layer — billing already works for you.

Use them together

They're not mutually exclusive. You can route BlockRun calls through Helicone if you want both: pay-per-call USDC settlement on the front end, deep request observability on the back. Set Helicone as your HTTP proxy and point your BlockRun SDK base URL through it.

The bottom line

Different layers of the stack. BlockRun is the payment + routing layer. Helicone is the observability layer. Pick the one that solves your bigger problem first; add the other when you need it.

If something on this page is wrong, email hello@blockrun.ai.

Related